Chemical bondingCambridge International AS & A Level Chemistry 9701
All courses

Cambridge International AS & A Level Chemistry 9701 · Topic 3, with 4.2 Bonding and structure

Chemical bonding

Everything in this page comes back to one idea: electrostatic attraction between positive nuclei and negative electrons. Ionic, covalent and metallic bonding are three ways of arranging that attraction, and every physical property that follows — melting point, hardness, conductivity, solubility, molecular shape — is a consequence of which arrangement you have and how strongly it holds.

What this page is

The whole of topic 3 and the lattice-structure half of topic 4.2, written out in full, with the 28 interactive animations embedded in the sections they belong to, plus 13 live simulations that compute their answers rather than showing a fixed picture. The animations run through Ruffle, a WebAssembly Flash emulator loaded from a CDN — everything else in this file works offline.

How to work through it

  • Read a section, then run its animation. The animations are mostly activities — sorting, true/false, drag-and-drop — so they are worth doing rather than watching.
  • Use the simulations to test a prediction you have already made. Predict the shape of SF4, then ask the VSEPR builder.
  • The 3.4.1 tags are 9701 learning outcomes. IB students: the equivalent material sits in Structure 2.1–2.4, and differences are flagged in purple boxes.
  • Press / to search the whole page.

Why atoms bond3.1–3.3

An isolated atom has a certain energy. If two atoms can arrange their electrons so that the system's total energy is lower than the two separate atoms, they will do so, and the energy difference is released. That lowered-energy arrangement is a chemical bond. Bonds do not form because atoms "want a full outer shell" — the full-shell rule is a useful bookkeeping shortcut that works because filled shells usually happen to be the low-energy arrangement for the first two rows of the periodic table. It fails often enough that you should hold it loosely: Fe3+, Cu2+, Pb2+, SF6 and PCl5 all exist.

Common trap

Students routinely over-apply noble gas structures. As the Cambridge support notes put it, there are far more ions that don't have noble gas structures than ions that do. Which ion actually forms is decided by energetics — the balance of ionisation energy, electron affinity and lattice energy — not by a rule about eight electrons.

Three ways to lower the energy

BondBetweenWhat happens to the outer electronsHeld together by
Ionicmetal + non-metalTransferred from metal to non-metal, giving separate ionsAttraction of oppositely charged ions in a giant lattice
Covalentnon-metal + non-metalShared as pairs between two nucleiAttraction of both nuclei for the shared pair
Metallicmetal + metalDelocalised over the whole latticeAttraction of the cation lattice for the delocalised electrons
All three are electrostatic. The difference is only in how the electrons are distributed.

Definition · what an examiner wants

Every bonding definition in this syllabus must contain the words electrostatic attraction and must say what is attracted to what. "Sharing electrons" on its own does not define a covalent bond; "the electrostatic attraction between two nuclei and the shared pair of electrons between them" does.

Ionic bonding3.2.1–3.2.2

Definition

Ionic (electrovalent) bonding is the electrostatic attraction between oppositely charged ions, formed by the complete transfer of one or more electrons from a metal atom to a non-metal atom.

Sodium has one electron outside a stable 2,8 core, and losing it costs relatively little (first ionisation energy 496 kJ mol−1). Chlorine is one electron short of 2,8,8 and gains one exothermically. Neither of those steps, on its own, releases enough energy to make the reaction worthwhile — the transfer Na(g) + Cl(g) → Na+(g) + Cl−(g) is actually endothermic by about +147 kJ mol−1. What pays for the whole process is the lattice energy: the enormous release of energy when those gaseous ions pack into a three-dimensional lattice, about −787 kJ mol−1 for NaCl.

How to think about it

An "ionic bond" is not a bond between one Na+ and one Cl−. In the crystal each Na+ attracts six Cl− ions equally, and each Cl− attracts six Na+. This is why "NaCl" is a formula unit, not a molecule, and why you should never draw a line between two ions in a dot-and-cross diagram.

AnimationForming an ionic bond
Follow the electron from sodium to chlorine and watch the ions form.
Follow the electron from sodium to chlorine and watch the ions form.

Working out the charge on an ion

For s- and p-block elements the charge follows from the group: the atom loses or gains the smallest number of electrons that reaches the nearest noble gas configuration.

Group1213151617
Ion charge1+2+3+3−2−1−
ExampleNa+Mg2+Al3+N3−O2−Cl−
d-block metals do not follow this: Fe forms Fe2+ and Fe3+, Cu forms Cu+ and Cu2+, and neither has a noble gas structure.

Exam alert · dot-and-cross for ionic compounds3.7

  • Draw square brackets round each ion with the charge outside, top right.
  • Show the transferred electron as the other symbol (a cross among dots) so the marker can see where it came from — but do not use different colours of ink.
  • Read the question: "show outer electrons only" means outer electrons only; "complete dot-and-cross" means all shells.
  • A negative ion's outer shell is normally full and drawn with 8 electrons; a positive ion of a Group 1 or 2 metal is usually drawn as an empty bracket, [Na]+.
  • Never draw a bonding line between two ions.
AnimationRepresenting ionic bonding
Build the dot-and-cross diagram for an ionic compound.
Build the dot-and-cross diagram for an ionic compound.
Loading the model…

Why ionic compounds behave as they do

Every property comes from "giant lattice of charged particles, each strongly attracted to several neighbours":

Lattice energy depends on charge and size

Lattice energy is roughly proportional to (q+ × q−) / (r+ + r−). Doubling both charges quadruples the attraction; that is why MgO (2+/2−) melts more than 2000 °C above NaCl (1+/1−) despite having almost identical ionic radii and the same lattice type.

CompoundChargesSum of ionic radii / pmLattice energy / kJ mol−1Melting point / °C
NaCl1+, 1−283−787801
NaF1+, 1−235−929993
MgO2+, 2−212−37912852
CaO2+, 2−240−34012613
Charge dominates; size fine-tunes. Reference data, quoted to compare trends rather than for calculation.

IB cross-reference

IB Structure 2.1 asks the same thing but adds a quantitative slant: you are expected to deduce formulae from ion charges and to explain lattice enthalpy trends from ionic radius and charge. The "electrostatic attraction between oppositely charged ions" wording is identical in both syllabuses.

Covalent bonding3.4.1(a)–(b)

Definition

A covalent bond is the electrostatic attraction between the two nuclei of the bonded atoms and the shared pair of electrons between them.

The shared pair sits in the region between the two nuclei, where it is attracted by both. That attraction pulls the nuclei together; nuclear–nuclear repulsion pushes them apart. The bond length is the separation at which those balance, and the depth of the energy well at that separation is the bond energy.

bond length (0.074 nm for H2) separated atoms nuclei repel energy distance bond energy = depth of the well (436 kJ mol⁻¹)
Figure 1 — Potential energy as two hydrogen atoms approach. The bond exists because there is a minimum; its length is where the minimum sits and its strength is how deep it is.

Single, double and triple bonds

Shared pairsShown asExamplesComment
1 (single)one line, X–YH2, Cl2, HCl, CH4, NH3, H2O, C2H6One σ bond
2 (double)two lines, X=YO2, CO2, C2H4, SO2One σ + one π
3 (triple)three lines, X≡YN2, C2H2, HCN, COOne σ + two π
AnimationCovalent bonding
Build up shared pairs in H₂, HCl, methane, ammonia and water.
Build up shared pairs in H₂, HCl, methane, ammonia and water.

Expanded octets3.4.1(b)

Elements in Period 3 and below can accommodate more than eight electrons in their outer shell because d orbitals of similar energy are available. You are expected to know these:

MoleculeElectrons round the central atomShapeNote
SO210 (2 double bonds + 1 lone pair)bent, ≈119°Two S=O double bonds
SO312trigonal planar, 120°Three S=O double bonds
PCl510trigonal bipyramidalExists as PCl4+PCl6− in the solid
SF612octahedral, 90°Extremely inert; used as an insulating gas
Expanded octets are impossible for Period 2 elements — N, O, F and C never exceed eight. NCl5 does not exist.

Exam alert · drawing in three dimensions

For SF6 and PCl5 you are expected to use the standard conventions: an ordinary line in the plane of the paper, a solid wedge for a bond coming towards you, and a dashed or hashed line for a bond going back. Marks are lost for flat, ambiguous diagrams.

Loading the model…

Dative covalent (co-ordinate) bonding3.4.1(c)

Definition

A dative covalent (co-ordinate) bond is a covalent bond in which both electrons of the shared pair come from the same atom. It is shown by an arrow pointing from the donor atom to the acceptor.

The two requirements are a lone pair on the donor and a vacant orbital on the acceptor. Once formed, the bond is indistinguishable from any other covalent bond of the same type — all four N–H bonds in NH4+ have identical length and strength, and the ion is a perfect tetrahedron.

SpeciesDonor (lone pair)Acceptor (vacant orbital)Why it matters
NH4+N of NH3H+The syllabus example; all four bonds become equivalent
H3O+O of H2OH+What "H+(aq)" really is
Al2Cl6Cl of one AlCl3Al of the otherThe syllabus dimer; two dative bonds, one each way
NH3·BF3N of NH3B of BF3Classic donor–acceptor adduct; B completes its octet
[Al(H2O)6]3+O of each waterAl3+Six dative bonds; met later with complex ions
HN HH lone pair + H⁺ vacant 1s → HN HH H ⁺ the dative bond, drawn as an arrow
Figure 2 — The ammonium ion. The nitrogen lone pair is donated into the vacant 1s orbital of H⁺. After formation the arrow is a bookkeeping device only: the four bonds are identical.
AnimationCo-ordinate bonding
The donor–acceptor step, animated.
The donor–acceptor step, animated.
AnimationExamples of co-ordinate bonds
Ammonium, hydroxonium and the aluminium chloride dimer.
Ammonium, hydroxonium and the aluminium chloride dimer.
AnimationActivity · co-ordinate bonds, true or false?
Decide each statement, then check.
Decide each statement, then check.

Metallic bonding3.3.1

Definition

Metallic bonding is the electrostatic attraction between a lattice of positive metal ions and the sea of delocalised electrons formed from their outer shells.

A metal atom cannot lower its energy by transferring electrons to another metal atom — neither is electronegative enough to hold them. Instead the outer-shell orbitals of every atom in the crystal overlap into one continuous set of orbitals spanning the whole piece of metal, and the outer electrons occupy those. Each electron is no longer associated with a particular nucleus; the ibchem page describes the result as marbles stuck into blu-tack, the cations being the marbles and the delocalised electrons the blu-tack holding them.

AnimationMetallic bonding
The cation lattice and the delocalised electron sea.
The cation lattice and the delocalised electron sea.

What makes metallic bonding strong?

Two factors, and both are about how much charge is packed into how small a space:

  1. Number of delocalised electrons per atom (equivalently, the charge on the cation). Sodium contributes one, magnesium two, aluminium three.
  2. Size of the cation. A smaller ion puts its charge closer to the electron sea, so the attraction is stronger.
Group 1 metalIonic radius / pmm.p. / °C
Li76181
Na10298
K13863
Rb15239
Cs16729
Same charge (1+), increasing size — the bond weakens down the group.
Period 3 metalIon chargeRadius / pmm.p. / °C
Na1+10298
Mg2+72650
Al3+54660
Charge rises and size falls together, so the bond strengthens sharply across the period.

Common trap

Metals conduct electricity because delocalised electrons move, not because ions move. Ions moving is how a molten ionic compound conducts. Saying "the ions carry the current in a metal" is a standard lost mark.

Properties explained

Loading the model…

Comparing the three strong bonds

IonicCovalentMetallic
Particlescations + anionsatomscations + delocalised e−
Attraction betweenopposite ionstwo nuclei and a shared paircations and the electron sea
Directional?NoYesNo
Typical m.p.highvery high (giant) or very low (simple molecular)usually high
Conducts as a solid?NoNo (graphite is the exception)Yes
Conducts when molten?YesNoYes
Mechanicalhard, brittlehard (giant); soft, weak (molecular)malleable, ductile
AnimationActivity · types of bonding
Sort substances by the bonding they contain.
Sort substances by the bonding they contain.

σ and π bonds, and hybridisation3.4.2

A covalent bond is an overlap of atomic orbitals. How they overlap divides bonds into two kinds.

Definitions

A σ (sigma) bond is formed by end-on overlap of orbitals along the line joining the two nuclei. The electron density is concentrated on that axis, and the bond is free to rotate.

A π (pi) bond is formed by sideways overlap of p orbitals above and below (or in front of and behind) the internuclear axis. It has a nodal plane through the nuclei, is weaker than a σ bond, and locks the molecule against rotation.

σ: end-on overlap density sits on the axis · rotation is free π: sideways overlap nodal plane through the nuclei · rotation is blocked A double bond = 1 σ + 1 π C C σ framework holds the atoms together; the π bond adds strength and rigidity
Figure 3 — σ bonds form by end-on overlap, π bonds by sideways overlap of p orbitals. Every single bond is a σ bond; a double bond is σ + π; a triple bond is σ + 2π.

Hybridisation

Carbon's ground state is 1s22s22p2 — only two unpaired electrons, yet it forms four bonds. Promoting one 2s electron to the empty 2p orbital costs energy but is repaid four times over by the extra bonds. The 2s and 2p orbitals then mix into equivalent hybrid orbitals.

HybridOrbitals mixedσ bonds from the CLeft overGeometryExample
sp3one s + three p4nonetetrahedral, 109.5°CH4, C2H6, diamond
sp2one s + two p3one p, forms 1 πtrigonal planar, 120°C2H4, benzene, graphite
spone s + one p2two p, form 2 πlinear, 180°C2H2, HCN, CO2

The syllabus examples in detail

Exam alert · counting bonds

"How many σ and π bonds are in propene, CH3CH=CH2?" Count every line in the displayed formula: 8 lines total, of which one is the second line of the double bond. So 8 σ and 1 π. Rule: every bond contributes exactly one σ; each additional line is one π.

Bond energy and bond length3.4.3

Definitions

Bond energy (bond enthalpy, bond dissociation enthalpy) is the energy needed to break one mole of a covalent bond to give separated atoms, everything being in the gas state: X–Y(g) → X(g) + Y(g). It is always positive because breaking a bond absorbs energy. For HCl it is +432 kJ mol−1.

Bond length is the distance between the nuclei of two covalently bonded atoms.

Common trap · the gas-state condition

The "everything in the gas state" clause is not decoration. It is why you cannot feed bond energies straight into an enthalpy calculation for a reaction whose reactants or products are liquids or solids — you must include the enthalpy of vaporisation or sublimation first. This catches people out in the energetics unit.

The two trends, and why they run opposite ways

Larger atoms have more electron shells, so their nuclei end up further apart and the bond is longer. In a longer bond the shared pair is further from each nucleus and better shielded by the inner shells, so it is held less tightly — the bond is weaker. Shorter therefore usually means stronger.

BondLength / nmEnergy / kJ mol−1Consequence
C–F0.138467Fluoroalkanes are so unreactive they are set aside
C–Cl0.177346Reactivity of halogenoalkanes increases down the group because the C–X bond gets easier to break
C–Br0.193290
C–I0.214228
Reference data for the carbon–halogen bonds in CH3CH2–X.

How to think about it

Two independent effects compete as you go down a group: more protons in the nucleus (pulling harder) versus more inner shells (shielding and pushing the pair further out). Shielding and distance win, which is the same reason electronegativity falls down a group. If you can state that once, you have explained bond energy trends, electronegativity trends and halogenoalkane reactivity with a single argument.

Multiple bonds are shorter and stronger

BondLength / nmEnergy / kJ mol−1
C–C0.154350
C=C0.134610
C≡C0.120840
N–N0.145160
N≡N0.110944
Note that C=C is not twice as strong as C–C — a π bond is weaker than a σ bond, which is exactly why alkenes react by addition across the π bond while alkanes are inert.
Loading the model…

Electronegativity3.1.1–3.1.3 · 3.6.2

Definition

Electronegativity is the ability of an atom to attract the pair of electrons in a covalent bond towards itself.

It is a property of an atom within a bond, not of an isolated atom — which is why it is measured on a relative scale rather than in joules. The usual scale is Pauling's, running from caesium at 0.79 to fluorine at 3.98, the most electronegative element.

ElementHLiBeBCNOF
Pauling value2.200.981.572.042.553.043.443.98
ElementNaMgAlSiPSClBrI
Pauling value0.931.311.611.902.192.583.162.962.66
Reference data, Pauling scale. The full set used by the simulations below covers 38 elements.

What electronegativity depends on

Two factors, and they are the same two that control atomic radius and ionisation energy:

  1. Nuclear charge — more protons pull the bonding pair harder.
  2. Distance and shielding — the further the bonding pair is from the nucleus, and the more inner shells lie between, the weaker the pull. The relevant quantity is the number of unshielded protons, i.e. the effective nuclear charge felt by the bonding pair.

Across a period (Na → Cl): electronegativity increases

Nuclear charge rises by one proton each step. The added electron goes into the same shell, so shielding is essentially unchanged and the atomic radius falls. Effective nuclear charge on a bonding pair rises sharply, so the pull increases.

Down a group (F → I): electronegativity decreases

Nuclear charge also rises, but each step adds a complete inner shell. The bonding pair is now much further from the nucleus and much more shielded, and those effects outweigh the extra protons.

NaMgAl SiPSCl across Period 3 → increases χ 0.933.16 FClBrI down Group 17 → decreases 3.982.66
Figure 4 — The two trends. Both are explained by the same competition between nuclear charge on one side and distance plus shielding on the other; across a period charge wins, down a group distance wins.

Bond polarity, and bond type from Δχ3.1.4

If the two bonded atoms have equal electronegativity the shared pair sits centrally: the bond is pure (non-polar) covalent. If one atom pulls harder, the pair is displaced towards it, giving that atom a partial negative charge δ− and leaving the other δ+: a polar covalent bond with a permanent dipole. Push the difference far enough and the pair is transferred outright, which is an ionic bond.

How to think about it

Ionic and covalent are not two separate categories with a wall between them. They are the two ends of a continuous scale, and almost every real bond is somewhere in between. "Ionic with covalent character" and "covalent with ionic character" describe the same middle ground from opposite sides.

Electronegativity difference ΔχBond regarded as
less than 0.5pure covalent
0.5 to 1.6polar covalent
1.6 to 2.0a metal is involved → ionic; only non-metals → polar covalent
greater than 2.0ionic
The boundaries used by the Cambridge support notes. Textbooks disagree about the exact cut-offs — treat them as a guide, never as a law, and always say which convention you are using.
Loading the model…
AnimationPolar bonds
Watch the shared pair shift as electronegativity difference grows.
Watch the shared pair shift as electronegativity difference grows.

Polarising power and polarisability3.1.4

Coming from the ionic side: a small, highly charged cation distorts the electron cloud of a large anion, dragging electron density back into the space between the ions. That is covalent character in an ionic compound. The cation's ability to do this is its polarising power (high for small, highly charged ions such as Al3+ and Be2+); the anion's susceptibility is its polarisability (high for large, highly charged ions such as I−).

This is why AlCl3 sublimes at 178 °C and dissolves in organic solvents, behaving as a covalent molecule, while NaCl is a classic high-melting ionic solid — despite both being "metal + chlorine".

IB cross-reference

IB Structure 2.2 uses a bonding triangle (the van Arkel–Ketelaar diagram), plotting average electronegativity against Δχ, to place a compound on a continuum between ionic, covalent and metallic. The chemistry is identical to the table above; only the presentation differs. The simulation above reports both.

Polar bonds vs polar molecules

A molecule has a net dipole only if its individual bond dipoles do not cancel. Because a dipole is a vector, cancellation depends entirely on the shape. So a molecule can be full of strongly polar bonds and still be completely non-polar.

MoleculeShapeBonds polar?Molecule polar?Why
CO2linearyes, C=OnoThe two equal dipoles point exactly opposite and cancel
H2Obent, 104.5°yes, O–HyesThe bent shape means they add to a net dipole through the O
CCl4tetrahedralyes, C–ClnoFour identical dipoles arranged symmetrically cancel
CHCl3tetrahedralyesyesThe C–H bond breaks the symmetry
NH3trigonal pyramidalyes, N–HyesNot symmetrical; the lone pair adds to the dipole
BF3trigonal planaryes, and verynoThree dipoles at 120° sum to zero
SO2bent, ≈119°yesyesThe lone pair on S bends it, so they cannot cancel

Exam alert · the routine

  1. Work out the shape first (VSEPR — see Section 20).
  2. Mark δ+ and δ− on every bond.
  3. Ask: are all the outer atoms identical and symmetrically arranged? If yes, non-polar. If either fails, polar.
AnimationActivity · identifying polar molecules
Sort molecules into polar and non-polar.
Sort molecules into polar and non-polar.
Loading the model…

Intermolecular forces: the overview3.6.3

Simple molecular substances have two completely different kinds of attraction in them, and the whole topic depends on not confusing the two.

The one distinction that matters

Boiling water does not break O–H bonds. It separates water molecules from each other. The covalent bonds inside the molecule (464 kJ mol−1 for O–H) are untouched; only the intermolecular forces between molecules (about 20 kJ mol−1 per hydrogen bond) are overcome. Melting and boiling points of molecular substances are set by intermolecular forces, never by bond energies.

ForcePresent inTypical strength / kJ mol−1Requires
Instantaneous dipole–induced dipole (id–id, London, dispersion)every molecule and atom1 – 40+nothing — electrons are always moving
Permanent dipole–permanent dipole (pd–pd)polar molecules only5 – 25a net molecular dipole
Hydrogen bondingmolecules with H bonded to N, O or F10 – 40H–N/O/F and a lone pair on N/O/F
Cambridge classifies all three as van der Waals' forces, with hydrogen bonding treated as a special case. Other syllabuses reserve "van der Waals" for the first two. State which convention you are using.

Instantaneous dipole–induced dipole forces

Electrons in a molecule are in constant motion. At any instant they are, by chance, unevenly distributed, so the molecule has a fleeting instantaneous dipole. That dipole repels the electrons of a neighbouring molecule, inducing a dipole in it that is aligned to attract. The instantaneous dipole vanishes and reappears elsewhere within about 10−15 s, but the correlation between neighbours persists, and the time-averaged result is a real, always-attractive force.

Animationvan der Waals' forces
The instantaneous dipole and the dipole it induces next door.
The instantaneous dipole and the dipole it induces next door.

What makes them stronger

  1. More electrons (which usually means larger Mr). A bigger, more diffuse electron cloud is more polarisable: it distorts more easily, so the instantaneous dipoles are larger. This is the dominant factor.
  2. Greater surface contact. Long, thin molecules can lie alongside each other over their whole length; compact, spherical ones touch at fewer points. Branching reduces contact and therefore lowers the boiling point.
Isomer of C5H12Shapeb.p. / °C
pentanestraight chain36
2-methylbutaneone branch28
2,2-dimethylpropanenear-spherical9.5
Identical Mr (72) and identical numbers of electrons — the 26.5 °C spread is purely a surface-contact effect.

Common trap · "weakest force"

Textbooks call dispersion forces "the weakest intermolecular force". That is only true molecule-for-molecule at small size. In large molecules they are by far the largest contribution — iodine (Mr 254) is a solid at room temperature with nothing but dispersion forces holding it together, and dodecane boils at 216 °C. The Cambridge support notes make this point explicitly.

AnimationBoiling points of the alkanes
The homologous series, plotted.
The homologous series, plotted.
Loading the model…

Permanent dipole–dipole forces

A polar molecule has a permanent δ+ end and δ− end. Neighbouring molecules line up δ+ to δ−, and the attraction is extra to the id–id forces that are always present. Because it requires alignment, it is strongly weakened by thermal motion, which is why its contribution is smaller than people expect.

PairMrb.p. / °CForces present
butane, C4H1058−0.5id–id only
propanone, CH3COCH35856id–id + pd–pd
2-methylpropane58−12id–id only
propanal, CH3CH2CHO5849id–id + pd–pd
Four substances with the same Mr. The polar ones boil about 55 °C higher — that gap is the permanent dipole contribution.
AnimationActivity · permanent dipole–dipole or not?
Decide which substances have permanent dipole forces.
Decide which substances have permanent dipole forces.
AnimationPermanent dipole–dipole forces
Molecules aligning δ+ to δ−.
Molecules aligning δ+ to δ−.

Hydrogen bonding3.6.1

Definition

A hydrogen bond is the attraction between a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a highly electronegative atom (N, O or F) and a lone pair on the N, O or F of a neighbouring molecule.

Both halves of that definition are needed. Hydrogen bonded to N, O or F is unusually δ+ because those atoms are very electronegative and because hydrogen has no inner shell — strip away most of its single electron and what is exposed is a bare proton, an extremely concentrated positive charge. A lone pair on a small, electronegative neighbour can approach that charge very closely. The bond is directional: it is strongest when X–H···Y is linear.

O δ− HH δ+ two lone pairs O δ− HH hydrogen bond ≈20 kJ mol⁻¹ · about 10× a dispersion force, 1/20 of an O–H bond
Figure 5 — A hydrogen bond runs from the δ+ hydrogen of one molecule to a lone pair on the oxygen of the next. It is drawn as a dashed line, and the lone pair must be shown for full marks.

Exam alert · drawing a hydrogen bond

  • Draw a dashed line, not a solid one.
  • Start it at the H, end it at a lone pair, and show that lone pair.
  • Mark δ+ and δ−.
  • Keep O–H···O roughly in a straight line.
  • Do not draw a hydrogen bond to a carbon-bonded hydrogen — CH4 and CHCl3 do not hydrogen bond, however polar they look.

The evidence: boiling points of the hydrides

Down each group the hydrides get heavier, gain electrons, and boil at steadily higher temperatures — exactly as dispersion forces predict. Group 14 does this cleanly all the way. In Groups 15, 16 and 17 the first member breaks the pattern violently, and in every case that first member is the one that can hydrogen bond.

GroupPeriod 2Period 3Period 4Period 5
14CH4 −162SiH4 −112GeH4 −88SnH4 −52
15NH3 −33PH3 −88AsH3 −62SbH3 −17
16H2O 100H2S −60H2Se −41H2Te −2
17HF 20HCl −85HBr −67HI −35
Boiling points in °C. Group 14 has no anomaly because CH4 cannot hydrogen bond. Water is the largest anomaly of all because each molecule has two δ+ hydrogens and two lone pairs, so it can form four hydrogen bonds; HF has three lone pairs but only one hydrogen, so it averages two.
AnimationHydrogen bonding and boiling points
The hydride anomaly, plotted and explained.
The hydride anomaly, plotted and explained.

Why water is strange3.6.4

Ice is less dense than water

Each water molecule can form four hydrogen bonds, arranged tetrahedrally. On freezing, the molecules take up the arrangement that satisfies all four, and that arrangement is an open, cage-like lattice containing large hexagonal holes. In liquid water the hydrogen bonds are constantly breaking and re-forming, so molecules can pack more closely — about 9% more closely. Ice therefore floats, and water reaches its maximum density at 4 °C rather than at its freezing point.

Why it matters beyond the exam

Ponds freeze from the top down, so the ice insulates the water below and aquatic life survives the winter. Almost no other substance behaves like this — for nearly everything else, the solid sinks in its own liquid.

The rest of the list

Deciding which forces act

The routine, in order

  1. Is it a molecular substance at all? If it is ionic, metallic or giant covalent, stop — there are no intermolecular forces to discuss.
  2. id–id forces are always present. Say so; estimate their size from the number of electrons and the molecular shape.
  3. Is the molecule polar? Shape first, then symmetry. If polar, add permanent dipole–dipole.
  4. Is there H bonded directly to N, O or F? If yes, and a lone pair is available, add hydrogen bonding.
  5. Compare like with like. When comparing two substances, say which forces each has and comment on the number of electrons — a comparison that ignores Mr is incomplete.
Loading the model…

Topics 4.2 and 3.5

Bonding and structure · Shapes of molecules

Bonding decides what holds the particles together. Structure decides how they are arranged, and between them they fix every physical property. Then, for molecules, shape decides polarity, packing and — later in the course — reactivity.

The four types of crystal

Giant ionicGiant metallicGiant covalentSimple molecular
Lattice pointsionscations in an electron seaatomsmolecules
Held byionic bondsmetallic bondscovalent bondsintermolecular forces
m.p. / b.p.highusually highvery highlow
Hardnesshard, brittlemalleable, ductilevery hard (graphite soft)soft
Electrical conductivityonly molten / aqueousgood, solid and liquidnone (graphite conducts)none
Solubility in wateroften solubleinsoluble (may react)insolubleonly if polar / H-bonding
ExamplesNaCl, MgO, CaF2Na, Mg, Fe, Cudiamond, graphite, SiO2I2, ice, CO2(s), S8
Learn this table by the reasoning, not by rote: in every row the answer follows from what has to be broken or moved.

Exam alert · the melting-point question

"Explain why sodium chloride has a much higher melting point than iodine." A full answer names both structures, names both forces, and says what is overcome: NaCl is a giant ionic lattice, so melting must overcome strong electrostatic attractions between oppositely charged ions throughout the lattice; iodine is simple molecular, so melting only has to overcome weak instantaneous dipole–induced dipole forces between I2 molecules — the covalent bonds within the molecules are not broken. The last clause is where most marks are lost.

AnimationProperties of ionic substances
Work through the property list and the reason for each.
Work through the property list and the reason for each.
AnimationProperties of sodium chloride
The NaCl lattice and what follows from it.
The NaCl lattice and what follows from it.
AnimationProperties of metallic substances
Conductivity, malleability and melting point from the electron sea.
Conductivity, malleability and melting point from the electron sea.
AnimationActivity · metallic and ionic crystals
Sort the properties between the two structures.
Sort the properties between the two structures.

Replacing a broken animation

Three of the original animations for this part of the course could not be recovered — their data is incomplete at source, which no emulator can repair. Each has been replaced here by a live simulation that does the same job: the structure–property matcher below, the covalent-structure property explorer at the end of Simple molecular crystals, and the VSEPR shape builder in Shapes of molecules and ions.

Loading the model…

Ionic and metallic lattices in detail

Sodium chloride: 6:6 coordination

Each Na+ is surrounded octahedrally by six Cl− ions, and each Cl− by six Na+ — a face-centred cubic arrangement. The formula NaCl states the ratio, 1:1; there is no such thing as an NaCl molecule. Caesium chloride, whose cation is larger, achieves 8:8 coordination instead, showing that the packing arrangement is set by the relative sizes of the ions.

Why ionic solids are brittle

Apply enough force to slide one plane of ions over the next by half a lattice spacing and every ion is now adjacent to an ion of the same charge. The lattice does not deform, it repels itself apart, and the crystal cleaves along a flat plane. Compare a metal, where sliding one plane over another changes nothing because the electron sea is indifferent to where the cations are.

Close packing in metals

Metal atoms are effectively spheres of equal size with non-directional bonding, so they pack as efficiently as spheres can — 74% of space filled. There are two ways to stack the layers:

Both give each atom 12 nearest neighbours. Some metals adopt the slightly less efficient body-centred cubic arrangement (68%, 8 nearest neighbours): the Group 1 metals, and iron at room temperature.

Loading the model…

Giant covalent structures

Diamond

AnimationProperties of diamond
The tetrahedral network and the properties it produces.
The tetrahedral network and the properties it produces.

Graphite

AnimationProperties of graphite
Layers, delocalised electrons and slip.
Layers, delocalised electrons and slip.

The comparison examiners want

Diamond and graphite are made of the same atoms and differ only in arrangement, so any property difference must be traced to structure. Hardness → 3D network vs weakly held layers. Conductivity → four localised electrons vs three localised plus one delocalised. Density → tetrahedral packing vs open layers. Melting point → both very high, because in both cases covalent bonds must break; this is the one property where they agree, and saying "graphite melts easily because the layers slide" is wrong.

Other allotropes and networks

StructureArrangementDistinctive property
Graphenea single graphite layer, one atom thickStrongest material measured; excellent conductor; effectively transparent
Fullerene, C60closed cage of 20 hexagons and 12 pentagonsSimple molecular, not giant — soluble in benzene, sublimes at 800 K, soft
Nanotubesrolled graphene cylindersVery high tensile strength; conducting or semiconducting depending on how they are rolled
Silicon(IV) oxide, SiO2every Si bonded to 4 O, every O to 2 SiGiant covalent, m.p. 1710 °C, hard, insulating — the structural analogue of diamond
C60 is the trap in this table: it is made of carbon and looks exotic, but its structure is simple molecular, so its properties follow the simple molecular column.
AnimationAllotropes of carbon
Diamond, graphite and the fullerenes side by side.
Diamond, graphite and the fullerenes side by side.

Simple molecular crystals

The lattice points are whole molecules, and only intermolecular forces hold them in place. Everything follows: low melting and boiling points, softness, no conductivity in any state, and solubility governed by whether the solvent can offer similar forces.

Iodine

I2 molecules sit at the points of a face-centred cubic lattice, held by dispersion forces only. Iodine still melts at 114 °C — high for a molecular solid — because each molecule has 106 electrons and is highly polarisable. It sublimes readily to a violet vapour, and dissolves in hexane (dispersion forces on both sides) far better than in water.

Ice

Water molecules held in an open tetrahedral network of hydrogen bonds, four per molecule. Compared with iodine, ice melts at a much lower temperature (0 °C) even though hydrogen bonds are individually stronger than iodine's dispersion forces — because a water molecule has only 10 electrons, and there are far fewer forces per unit volume to break.

AnimationActivity · covalent crystals, true or false?
Statements about diamond, graphite, iodine and ice.
Statements about diamond, graphite, iodine and ice.
Loading the model…

Shapes of molecules and ions3.5.1–3.5.2

The principle

Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion. The electron pairs in the outer shell of the central atom all repel one another, so they arrange themselves as far apart in space as possible. The shape of the molecule is then the arrangement of the atoms within that electron-pair geometry.

Repulsion strength runs: lone pair–lone pair > lone pair–bonding pair > bonding pair–bonding pair.

Why a lone pair repels more

A bonding pair is pulled out between two nuclei and is therefore relatively compact and localised. A lone pair is held by only one nucleus, so it spreads out closer to the central atom and occupies a wider angular region. Being fatter and nearer, it pushes the bonding pairs away harder — closing the bond angle by roughly 2.5° per lone pair.

The method, in four steps

  1. Count the outer-shell electrons of the central atom.
  2. Add one electron per single bond to a monovalent atom such as H or a halogen. For a double bond, add nothing extra — a double bond counts as one region of electron density and the two electrons the central atom contributes are already counted. For a dative bond in which the central atom is the acceptor, add two.
  3. Adjust for charge: subtract one electron per positive charge, add one per negative charge.
  4. Divide by two to get the total number of electron pairs; subtract the number of bonded atoms (bonding regions) to find the lone pairs. Then read the shape off the table.

Worked example 1 · NH3

N is in Group 15, so 5 outer electrons. Three N–H bonds add 3 → 8 electrons → 4 pairs. Three of them are bonding, so 1 lone pair. Four pairs arrange tetrahedrally; with one position occupied by a lone pair the atoms form a trigonal pyramid. The single lone pair compresses the ideal 109.5° to 107°.

Worked example 2 · SF4

S is in Group 16, so 6 outer electrons; four S–F bonds add 4 → 10 → 5 pairs, of which 4 are bonding and 1 is a lone pair. Five pairs are trigonal bipyramidal. The lone pair takes an equatorial position — at 120° it has only two neighbours at 90°, whereas an axial position would put it at 90° to three — so the shape is a see-saw, with angles compressed to about 117° and 89°.

Worked example 3 · SO42−

S has 6 outer electrons. The two negative charges add 2 → 8 → 4 pairs. Four bonded oxygens, so no lone pairs: a regular tetrahedron, 109.5°.

The complete table

PairsBondingLoneElectron-pair geometryShape of the moleculeBond angleExample
220linearlinear180°BeCl2, CO2
330trigonal planartrigonal planar120°BF3, SO3
321trigonal planarbent≈119°SO2
440tetrahedraltetrahedral109.5°CH4, NH4+, SO42−
431tetrahedraltrigonal pyramidal107°NH3, H3O+, PCl3
422tetrahedralbent104.5°H2O, H2S
550trigonal bipyramidaltrigonal bipyramidal120° and 90°PCl5
541trigonal bipyramidalsee-saw≈117°, 89°SF4
532trigonal bipyramidalT-shaped≈87.5°ClF3
523trigonal bipyramidallinear180°XeF2, I3−
660octahedraloctahedral90°SF6
651octahedralsquare pyramidal≈89°BrF5
642octahedralsquare planar90°XeF4
The 9701 core is the first six rows plus PCl5 and SF6. The rest are here because statement 3.5.2 allows unfamiliar examples — and because they are the ones the method handles without effort once you have understood it.
Loading the model…
AnimationShapes of molecules
The standard shapes, built up one pair at a time.
The standard shapes, built up one pair at a time.
AnimationWorking out basic shapes
Guided practice with the counting method.
Guided practice with the counting method.
AnimationMolecular shape calculations
Worked electron-pair counts.
Worked electron-pair counts.

The effect of lone pairs on bond angles

Within one electron-pair geometry, each lone pair you add closes the bond angle by roughly 2.5°. The classic series is the isoelectronic set of four-pair molecules:

MoleculeBonding pairsLone pairsShapeBond angle
CH440tetrahedral109.5°
NH331trigonal pyramidal107°
H2O22bent104.5°
All three have four electron pairs; only the number of lone pairs differs.
CH₄ · 109.5° C HH HH NH₃ · 107° N lone pair HHH H₂O · 104.5° O two lone pairs HH
Figure 6 — Four electron pairs in every case. Each lone pair added squeezes the H–X–H angle by about 2.5°.
AnimationEffect of lone pairs on bond angles
The 109.5 → 107 → 104.5 sequence, animated.
The 109.5 → 107 → 104.5 sequence, animated.
AnimationActivity · shapes of molecules
Build and name the shapes.
Build and name the shapes.

Double bonds, ions and unfamiliar molecules3.5.2

Exam alert · statement 3.5.2

The syllabus explicitly allows examiners to ask about molecules that are not in the list. As the Cambridge support notes say: there is no substitute for understanding this — if you learn examples parrot-fashion you will not cope with unfamiliar cases.

A double bond is one region of electron density

For shape purposes, treat C=O exactly as you would treat C–O. CO2 has two regions, so it is linear. SO3 has three, so it is trigonal planar.

SO2: the one you must know

Sulfur contributes 6 outer electrons. Two S=O double bonds add nothing (the double bond uses the sulfur's own electrons), so 6 electrons → 3 pairs: two bonding regions and one lone pair. Three regions are trigonal planar; with one being a lone pair the molecule is bent at about 119° — and therefore polar, unlike the linear, non-polar CO2.

ClO2: why understanding beats memorising

Chlorine dioxide looks like carbon dioxide on paper, yet it is bent, not linear. Chlorine has seven outer electrons; two are used in the double bonds, leaving five — two lone pairs and one unpaired electron on the central atom. That gives three regions of electron density round chlorine, so the electron geometry is trigonal planar and the molecule is bent, at about 117°. A molecule with an odd number of electrons cannot have a symmetrical pair arrangement.

Shapes of ions

IonOuter e− on central atomCharge adjustmentTotal pairsLone pairsShapeAngle
NH4+5 + 4 = 9−1 → 840tetrahedral109.5°
H3O+6 + 3 = 9−1 → 841trigonal pyramidal≈107°
NO3−5+1 → 630trigonal planar120°
SO42−6+2 → 840tetrahedral109.5°
ICl4−7 + 4 = 11+1 → 1262square planar90°
The counting method handles ions with no extra rules — just remember that a negative charge adds electrons and a positive charge removes them.

Common trap · naming the shape

Name the arrangement of the atoms, not of the electron pairs. Water is bent, not tetrahedral, even though its four pairs are tetrahedrally arranged. Writing "H2O is tetrahedral" scores zero.


Review

Review and data

Self-test30 questions

Written to the style of 9701 Paper 1 and the short-answer parts of Paper 2. Answers explain the reasoning, not just the letter.

Loading the model…

Definitions to learn word for word

TermDefinition
Ionic bondThe electrostatic attraction between oppositely charged ions.
Covalent bondThe electrostatic attraction between two nuclei and the shared pair of electrons between them.
Dative covalent bondA covalent bond in which both electrons of the shared pair come from the same atom.
Metallic bondThe electrostatic attraction between a lattice of positive metal ions and the delocalised electrons.
ElectronegativityThe ability of an atom to attract the pair of electrons in a covalent bond towards itself.
Bond energyThe energy needed to break one mole of a covalent bond to give separated atoms, all species being in the gas state.
Bond lengthThe distance between the nuclei of two covalently bonded atoms.
σ bondA bond formed by end-on overlap of atomic orbitals along the internuclear axis.
π bondA bond formed by sideways overlap of p orbitals above and below the internuclear axis.
Hydrogen bondThe attraction between a δ+ hydrogen atom bonded to N, O or F and a lone pair on the N, O or F of a neighbouring molecule.
id–id forceThe attraction arising when a temporary, instantaneous dipole in one molecule induces a dipole in a neighbour.
Permanent dipole–dipole forceThe attraction between the δ+ end of one polar molecule and the δ− end of another.
Polarising powerThe ability of a cation to distort the electron cloud of a neighbouring anion; greatest for small, highly charged cations.
PolarisabilityHow readily an ion's or molecule's electron cloud is distorted; greatest for large, highly charged anions and large molecules.
VSEPRElectron pairs in the outer shell of the central atom repel one another and arrange themselves as far apart as possible; lp–lp > lp–bp > bp–bp.

Data used on this page

All numerical values quoted here are reference data taken from standard tabulations, given so that trends can be compared. They are not a substitute for the Cambridge data booklet you are given in the examination, and any calculation you submit should use the booklet's values.

Pauling electronegativities used by the simulations
ElementχElementχElementχElementχ
H2.20Li0.98Be1.57B2.04
C2.55N3.04O3.44F3.98
Na0.93Mg1.31Al1.61Si1.90
P2.19S2.58Cl3.16K0.82
Ca1.00Ti1.54Fe1.83Cu1.90
Zn1.65Ga1.81Ge2.01As2.18
Se2.55Br2.96Rb0.82Sr0.95
Ag1.93Sn1.96Sb2.05Te2.10
I2.66Xe2.60Cs0.79Ba0.89
Pb2.33Au2.54Hg2.00Ba0.89
Average bond energies and bond lengths
BondEnergy / kJ mol−1Length / nmBondEnergy / kJ mol−1Length / nm
H–H4360.074C–H4100.109
C–C3500.154C=C6100.134
C≡C8400.120C–O3600.143
C=O8050.122O–H4650.096
N–H3900.101N–N1600.145
N≡N9440.110O=O4960.121
F–F1580.142Cl–Cl2420.199
Br–Br1930.228I–I1510.267
H–F5620.092H–Cl4320.127
H–Br3660.141H–I2980.161
C–F4670.138C–Cl3460.177
C–Br2900.193C–I2280.214
↑ back to the top

Chemical bonding — Cambridge International AS & A Level Chemistry 9701, topic 3 and topic 4.2 Bonding and structure.

© 2026 URstudymate.